Fear of the new
Been to two conferences in the last few weeks (AMA Strategic Marketing and Liquid Brand Summit) and at both, was surprised by the degree of fear in marketeers about the advent of social media. Really surprised. Especially at yesterday's conference where the best brand marketers in Silicon Valley were gathered. The typical response to "opening" the brand up to social media was "If I do that, I will let go of control of my brand." and "What if someone says something bad about my brand?" I expect more moxie from folks who market emerging and new technology for a living!
All I could think was "Hey, you have already lost control of your brand!" Especially for the big companies in the audience yesterday, it's an absolute guarantee that someone, somewhere is talking about their brand in the blogosphere, on the streets, in their offices. Doesn't it make more sense to know WHAT they're saying -- whether it's good or bad??? I would rather know than not know.
The bigger question and one that was glossed over yesterday was "How do we know when to respond to the feedback?" That's a question I think all marketeers will grapple with more and more. What and when is the appropriate level of response? You can go into five-alarm mode every time a negative comment is posted, but you can't ignore it either. Derek Gordon of Technorati was a sage advisor on this topic. He cautioned that the blogging community, like any community, was self-policing, and that flamers are very quickly corrected by others who know what's right about a company.
Lots to consider, lots of opportunity, lots of change. More coming in a later blog.

Jennifer:
It was nice having you attend the Liquid Brand Summit, and I'm glad that you found it interesting. I agree with you that brands seem to be fearful about the movement towards social media...after all, for the last 50 years we've been carefully editing the messages and crafting the image of brands in order to influence perceptions. For most of this time, the conversation has been one-sided, with the consumer at the receiving end of the propaganda. The ability for consumers to provide feedback radically changes the paradigm, and brands are struggling to figure out how to deal with it. What seemed apparent to me is that there's a trend towards advocating transparency. Brands are being encouraged to enter in a conversation that is honest and authentic...and to be open to negative criticism. Listening without over-reacting will indicate that brands are open to feedback...and do not need to be defensive about every negative posting.
Reply to this
To my thinking, a logo and trademark is owned but a brand is the collective perception held in the minds of the market (individuals or corporations). Consumers or buyers at corporations own (hold) that perception.
Naive is the marketer who does not see social media as a means to influence and shape those preceptions.
Reply to this